I tried adding some labels I found in a guide ( ) Cause: Get : unsupported protocol scheme \"\"" So now that I got that working I get a Error 500 message when I try to open mydomain.tld/nextcloud. Which shouldn't be too much of an issue since both traefik and nextcloud are running on the same machine (and besides everything else is going over http). I know it's potentially a security issue, but if I'm not mistaken it only opens up the possibility of a man in the middle attack. So for now I'm just using the .tls.insecureSkipVerify=true label to work around this. My first issue was that nextcloud forces https, which traefik doesn't like unless you configure some stuff. It's probably just some traefik labels I need to add to the nextcloud container, but I'm simply too much of a newb to know which ones I need. But I can't get it to work behind traefik using a subdirectory. I got everything set up, added users and smb shares and everybody can connect fine. I've read dozens of guides regarding nextcloud, but I can't get it to work.Ĭurrently I'm using the linuxserver/nextcloud docker and from my internal network it's working great. So far so good, everything is using ssl and working great.īut as soon as I have to configure some extra stuff for the containers to work behind a reverse proxy I get lost. You only need 4 traefik specific labels and that's it. But that's mostly due to the fact that these are super easy to set up. Hope I explained that so it makes sense when being read.Īnother step to take that may reduce disk I/O, depending on amount of RAM is to DL to a RAM drive for your incompletes and only write to a physical disk once all the processing has been completed.I'm running traefik as a reverse proxy on my unraid (6.6.6)Īpps like, sonarr/radarr, nzbget, organizr, all work fine. With UnRAID and Docker containers even if your newly downloaded files are on the same physical drive when using separate mnt points UnRAID treats the file move as if it were physically two different drives and it rewrites 100% of every file again.
#Unraid nzbget Pc#
Your drive performance suffers because with your current setup a 4gig DL file becomes an additional 4gig-12gig file disk xfer.įor a clear understanding think about the difference in file move time on your PC when it's: Move C:\dir\files to d:\dir\files vs Move C:\dir\files to C:\dir2\filesįor 4 gigs the first C: to D: may take 10 minutes while the 2nd C:\dir to C:\dir2 takes 10 seconds. Under your setup every file you DL is moved at least twice if not three or four times. Under this setup your files will be written one time and any successive directory moves will be handled by rewriting the much smaller file allocation table which essentially negates all I/O traffic you currently have. Ex: /data/downloads/ & /data/media/ as well as the appropriate subdirectories under downloads and media. The example Space Invader One uses is to add /data/ as the single parent to all shared mnt points.
#Unraid nzbget download#
You may eliminate your disk I/O issues after completing an NZBGet download by utilizing a single mapped directory tree that extends from a single /mnt/ point and then mapping that mount point across all containers. Pros please forgive me if I misqoute a term as a I've just discovered this myself.
#Unraid nzbget how to#
If someone has experienced this and knows how to fix it please let me know. I've also read that some people use a different file system for the drive itself my unassigned drive that everything is downloaded to is xfs. If this is the case how do you configure this with Sonarr/Radarr so everything is moved to the proper folders when the mover starts? I've read that some people use a cache drive to download/repair to and a mover is scheduled to move the finished downloads to the array once a day. I do have NZBGet/Plex/Sonarr/Radarr pinned to only use certain CPU cores but it seems like that doesn't matter and once the bottle necking occurs all my cores go to 100% - even the ones that aren't supposed to be used by those dockers. NZBGet requires low system resources and runs great on binhex-nzbhydra2 beta Downloaders, Media Applications Video NZBHydra2 is a meta search for NZB indexers. It supports client/server mode, automatic par-check/-repair, web-interface, command-line interface, etc. My CPU utilization spikes to 100% on all cores and I believe the IO is bottle necked as well - I'm just now trying to track this with netdata. NZBGet is a cross-platform binary newsgrabber for nzb files, written in C++. This causes my server to bottleneck like crazy. I have NZBGet set to download to an unassigned drive, once its finished Sonarr/Radarr move the file into the array and Plex processes it. My system is brought to a halt basically when NZBGet finishes a download and moves it.
0 kommentar(er)
